Worked examples · Sheet 3
Non-existence of limits via restrictions
Theory used: Restriction theoremLimit in two variables
Go to: Exercise 1Exercise 2Exercise 3
Exercise 1
Determine whether the following limit exists
One computes the restrictions along the two axes. On the -axis one sets : the function is constantly , so the restriction tends to . On the -axis one sets : the function is constantly , so the restriction tends to . By the restriction theorem, if the limit existed every restriction would have to tend to the same value; since two restrictions produce different values, the limit does not exist.
Exercise 2
Determine whether the following limit exists
Along the axes the function is identically zero, because the numerator vanishes when one of the two coordinates is zero; the axes alone are therefore not enough to reach a conclusion. One then restricts the function to the pencil of lines : substituting gives , a value that is constant along each line but depends on the slope . For the restriction tends to , while for it tends to . Since two restrictions produce different limits, the limit does not exist.
Exercise 3
Determine whether the following limit exists
Along every line the restriction equals , which tends to as whatever is; the restriction to the -axis is also zero. All lines through the origin therefore produce the same value , but this does not prove the existence of the limit, because the restriction theorem provides only necessary conditions. The denominator contains , so one tries the parabola , which balances the degrees: substituting gives the constant value . Since the restriction to the parabola tends to and the restrictions to the lines tend to , the limit does not exist.