Ripetizioni di AnalisiAnalysis 2UnlockedITSearch

Worked examples · Sheet 3

Second derivatives and local study of the implicit function

Theory used: Second derivative of the implicit functionLocal study of the implicit functionDini's theorem (two variables)

Go to: Exercise 1Exercise 2Exercise 3

Exercise 1

Verify that the equation

implicitly defines a function near the point and compute and .

The point belongs to the curve and is nonzero, therefore Dini’s theorem applies; since is a polynomial, hence of class , the implicit function is of class . For the derivatives we differentiate the identity with respect to : we obtain , which at the point gives , therefore . Differentiating a second time, the term produces by the product rule, hence the identity becomes . Substituting and we obtain , from which .

Exercise 2

Verify that the equation

implicitly defines a function near the point , and determine whether is a local maximum or minimum point for .

x y -1123-2-112 O
y=φ(x)y = \varphi(x)
The curve is the graph of : at the tangent is horizontal and has a local maximum

The hypotheses of Dini’s theorem are satisfied at the point, therefore the implicit function exists and is of class , because is a polynomial. Since , the first derivative is zero, therefore is a stationary point of . For the second derivative we differentiate the identity twice: the first differentiation gives and the second gives . At the point , hence the first term is zero and what remains is , that is . Since the second derivative is negative at a stationary point, is a local maximum point for the implicit function.

Exercise 3

Verify that the equation

implicitly defines a function near the point , study its monotonicity and determine the nature of the point .

The point belongs to the curve and the derivative is positive at every point of the plane, therefore Dini’s theorem applies and the implicit function is defined and of class near . The formula for the first derivative gives : the denominator is always positive, therefore the sign of coincides with the sign of . Hence is decreasing for and increasing for , and from this alone turns out to be a minimum point. The second derivative confirms the result: differentiating the identity twice we obtain , and at the point, where and , what remains is , that is .

Contents